Lernsprache
Brand
Quelle
Sprachlevel
Übungstyp
Ausgabennummer
202005
Ausgabe EVT
Position
24
Original-Rubrik
Lesen und verstehen
Original-Unter-Rubrik
Workplace romances
ContentHub Node reference (NID)
68612
Übungscontent
Übungscontent(JSON)
{"content":[{"content":{"params":{"taskDescription":"<p>Complete the sentences below using these words. They are all marked red in the article.<\/p>\n","overallFeedback":[{"from":0,"to":100}],"checkAnswer":"\u00dcberpr\u00fcfen","tryAgain":"Wiederholen","showSolution":"L\u00f6sung anzeigen","dropZoneIndex":"Drop-Zone @index.","empty":"Drop-Zone @index ist leer.","contains":"Drop-Zone @index enth\u00e4lt ziehbare @draggable.","draggableIndex":"Draggable @text. @index of @count draggables.","tipLabel":"Tipp anzeigen","correctText":"Richtig!","incorrectText":"Falsch!","resetDropTitle":"Reset drop","resetDropDescription":"Sind Sie sicher, dass Sie alle Optionen zur\u00fccksetzen m\u00f6chten?","grabbed":"Draggable is grabbed.","cancelledDragging":"Cancelled dragging.","correctAnswer":"Korrekte Antwort:","feedbackHeader":"R\u00fcckmeldung","behaviour":{"enableRetry":true,"enableSolutionsButton":true,"enableCheckButton":true,"instantFeedback":false},"scoreBarLabel":"You got :num out of :total points","textField":"A. Experience and enthusiasm are a winning *combination* in business. \nB. A boss should not show *favouritism* towards anyone. \nC. Have you heard the latest *gossip* about John? \nD. There was some controversy over her *appointment* to a senior position. \nE. We need to balance the need for *transparency* with the need for privacy. \nF. I\u2019m very happy about the *outcomes* of the last meetings."},"library":"H5P.DragText 1.7","metadata":{"contentType":"Drag Text","license":"U","title":"Unbenannt: Drag Text","extraTitle":"Unbenannt: Drag Text","authors":[],"changes":[]},"subContentId":"07923d6a-4848-42d5-a240-df5f40e744bd"},"useSeparator":"auto"},{"content":{"params":{"text":"</p><h3><span>Article<\/span><\/h3>\n\n<p><strong>\u201cShould workplace romances be dealt with in an open, adult way or made taboo?\u201d<\/strong>\nHow should corporations cope with corporate cupid? Is sex at work a matter for HR policy? Should, or indeed can, one try to legislate matters of the heart or hormones? Should workplace romances be dealt with in an open, adult way or <strong>made taboo<\/strong>?\nWorkplace romances are inevitable. People with similar education, interests and values are recruited to organizations. And if they spend eight or more hours a day together, it\u2019s no surprise that attractions develop. So, why shouldn\u2019t the office be a good place to find a partner?\nThe argument goes that workplace romances can and do have an impact on organizational dynamics, which, in turn, affect <span><strong>outcomes<\/strong><\/span> \u2014 productivity, morale, efficiency. Senior people can <strong>lose the plot<\/strong>, <strong>take their eye off the ball<\/strong>, compromise their integrity. New channels of unofficial communication can be opened up and closed down. The <span><strong>appointment<\/strong><\/span> of favoured sexual partners can seriously affect how people perceive the <span><strong>transparency<\/strong><\/span> and justice of a selection process or promotional system.\nTwo criteria define workplace relationships. One is hierarchy and the other is the openness of the relationship. The <strong><span>combination<\/span> <\/strong>of these factors gives four groups. So, you could get two journalists openly living together, the head of sales openly dating a team member, two board members keeping an affair <strong>hush-hush<\/strong> and a married CEO bedding his secretary.\nThere is some evidence that job performance goes up among those in same-level relationships, but goes down in hierarchical relationships. And the theory is that a lot of energy is wasted in trying to keep close relationships secret.\nBut there are other factors that impact job performance. The first is pretty obvious: how good is the relationship? A healthy relationship <strong>boosts morale<\/strong>, energy and enthusiasm. Work motivation can improve because workplace lovers\u2019 enthusiasm for being at work increases. So, if you put pressure on a relationship, you will cause stress for individuals and reduce motivation.\nBut workplace relationships can cause resentment among other employees who feel, rightly or wrongly, that <strong><span>favouritism<\/span><\/strong> occurs. This could decrease the productivity and morale of those not in a workplace relationship. And the more counter-cultural romantic relationships are to an organization, the greater the problem. Workplace relationships happen, full stop. Draconian rules often lead to secrecy, <strong>rumours<\/strong>, <span><strong>gossip<\/strong><\/span> and false accusations. Being open, grown-up and sensible is the best strategy.<\/p>\n"},"library":"H5P.AdvancedText 1.1","subContentId":"5c924065-6ef7-410a-88f9-feeac74eed81","metadata":{"contentType":"Text","license":"U","title":"Unbenannt: Text","authors":[],"changes":[]}},"useSeparator":"auto"}]},</strong></span></strong></span></strong></strong></strong></span></strong></strong></span></strong></span></strong></strong></strong></span></strong></strong></p></span></h3>
Updated
Yes
Stand alone
Off
Reading time
65
Display context
Off