Summary

{"content":[{"content":{"params":{"introPage":{"showIntroPage":false,"startButtonText":"Start","introduction":""},"progressType":"dots","passPercentage":50,"texts":{"prevButton":"Zur\u00fcck","nextButton":"Weiter","finishButton":"Beenden","textualProgress":"Aktuelle Frage: @current von @total Fragen","jumpToQuestion":"Frage %d von %total","questionLabel":"Frage","readSpeakerProgress":"Frage @current von @total","unansweredText":"Unbeantwortet","answeredText":"Beantwortet","currentQuestionText":"Aktuelle Frage"},"disableBackwardsNavigation":false,"randomQuestions":false,"endGame":{"showResultPage":true,"showSolutionButton":true,"noResultMessage":"Beendet","message":"Ihr Ergebnis:","overallFeedback":[{"from":0,"to":100}],"solutionButtonText":"L\u00f6sung anzeigen","retryButtonText":"Wiederholen","finishButtonText":"Beenden","showAnimations":false,"skippable":false,"skipButtonText":"Video \u00fcberspringen"},"override":{"checkButton":true},"questions":[{"library":"H5P.MultiChoice 1.12","params":{"question":"<p>Choose the best summary of Adrian Furnham\u2019s article.&lt;\/p&gt;\n","answers":[{"text":"\nA. You shouldn\u2019t get involved in an office romance.&lt;\/div&gt;\n&lt;\/div&gt;\n","correct":false,"tipsAndFeedback":{"tip":"","chosenFeedback":"","notChosenFeedback":""}},{"text":"\nB. Job performance goes down in hierarchical romances at work.&lt;\/div&gt;\n&lt;\/div&gt;\n","correct":false,"tipsAndFeedback":{"tip":"","chosenFeedback":"(While the topics in the other answers are discussed, only option B correctly summarizes the whole article.)&lt;\/div&gt;\n","notChosenFeedback":"(While the topics in the other answers are discussed, only option B correctly summarizes the whole article.)&lt;\/div&gt;\n"}},{"text":"\n\nC. Workplace relationships can cause resentment among other employees.&lt;\/div&gt;\n&lt;\/div&gt;\n&lt;\/div&gt;\n","correct":false,"tipsAndFeedback":{"tip":"","chosenFeedback":"","notChosenFeedback":""}},{"text":"\n\nD. An open, adult approach to office romances is the best policy.&lt;\/div&gt;\n&lt;\/div&gt;\n&lt;\/div&gt;\n","correct":true,"tipsAndFeedback":{"tip":"","chosenFeedback":"D correctly sums up the article. Option A is not an argument made by the author. In fact, he says the opposite (\u201cWorkplace relationships happen, full stop.\u201d (see lines 31\u201332)). Options B (lines 20\u201321) and C (lines 28\u201329) each focus only on one of several points made in the column.&lt;\/div&gt;\n","notChosenFeedback":"D correctly sums up the article. Option A is not an argument made by the author. In fact, he says the opposite (\u201cWorkplace relationships happen, full stop.\u201d (see lines 31\u201332)). Options B (lines 20\u201321) and C (lines 28\u201329) each focus only on one of several points made in the column.&lt;\/div&gt;\n"}}],"behaviour":{"enableRetry":true,"enableSolutionsButton":true,"enableCheckButton":true,"type":"auto","singlePoint":false,"randomAnswers":false,"showSolutionsRequiresInput":false,"disableImageZooming":false,"confirmCheckDialog":false,"confirmRetryDialog":false,"autoCheck":false,"passPercentage":100,"showScorePoints":true},"overallFeedback":[{"from":0,"to":100}],"UI":{"checkAnswerButton":"\u00dcberpr\u00fcfen","showSolutionButton":"L\u00f6sung anzeigen","tryAgainButton":"Wiederholen","tipsLabel":"Hinweis zeigen","scoreBarLabel":"Punkte","tipAvailable":"Hinweis verf\u00fcgbar","feedbackAvailable":"R\u00fcckmeldung verf\u00fcgbar","readFeedback":"R\u00fcckmeldung lesen","wrongAnswer":"Falsche Antwort","correctAnswer":"Richtige Antwort","shouldCheck":"H\u00e4tte gew\u00e4hlt werden m\u00fcssen","shouldNotCheck":"H\u00e4tte nicht gew\u00e4hlt werden sollen","noInput":"Bitte antworte, bevor du die L\u00f6sung ansiehst"},"confirmCheck":{"header":"Beenden?","body":"Bist Du sicher, dass Du beenden m\u00f6chtest?","cancelLabel":"Abbrechen","confirmLabel":"Beenden"},"confirmRetry":{"header":"Wiederholen?","body":"Bist Du sicher, dass Du die Aufgabe wiederholen m\u00f6chtest?","cancelLabel":"Abbrechen","confirmLabel":"Best\u00e4tigen"},"media":{"params":{}}},"subContentId":"4f020fb9-c148-400c-b67b-c42d5e86513f","metadata":{"contentType":"Multiple Choice","license":"U","title":"Unbenannt: Multiple Choice","extraTitle":"Unbenannt: Multiple Choice","authors":[],"changes":[]}}]},"library":"H5P.QuestionSet 1.15","subContentId":"26eb379d-da5c-4b7e-af12-a7f1a434c361","metadata":{"contentType":"Question Set","license":"U","title":"Unbenannt: Question Set","extraTitle":"Unbenannt: Question Set","authors":[],"changes":[]}},"useSeparator":"auto"},{"content":{"params":{"text":"</p><h3><span>Article&lt;\/span&gt;&lt;\/h3&gt;\n\n<p><strong>\u201cShould workplace romances be dealt with in an open, adult way or made taboo?\u201d&lt;\/strong&gt;\nHow should corporations cope with corporate cupid? Is sex at work a matter for HR policy? Should, or indeed can, one try to legislate matters of the heart or hormones? Should workplace romances be dealt with in an open, adult way or <strong>made taboo&lt;\/strong&gt;?\nWorkplace romances are inevitable. People with similar education, interests and values are recruited to organizations. And if they spend eight or more hours a day together, it\u2019s no surprise that attractions develop. So, why shouldn\u2019t the office be a good place to find a partner?\nThe argument goes that workplace romances can and do have an impact on organizational dynamics, which, in turn, affect <span><strong>outcomes&lt;\/strong&gt;&lt;\/span&gt; \u2014 productivity, morale, efficiency. Senior people can <strong>lose the plot&lt;\/strong&gt;, <strong>take their eye off the ball&lt;\/strong&gt;, compromise their integrity. New channels of unofficial communication can be opened up and closed down. The <span><strong>appointment&lt;\/strong&gt;&lt;\/span&gt; of favoured sexual partners can seriously affect how people perceive the <span><strong>transparency&lt;\/strong&gt;&lt;\/span&gt; and justice of a selection process or promotional system.\nTwo criteria define workplace relationships. One is hierarchy and the other is the openness of the relationship. The <strong><span>combination&lt;\/span&gt; &lt;\/strong&gt;of these factors gives four groups. So, you could get two journalists openly living together, the head of sales openly dating a team member, two board members keeping an affair <strong>hush-hush&lt;\/strong&gt; and a married CEO bedding his secretary.\nThere is some evidence that job performance goes up among those in same-level relationships, but goes down in hierarchical relationships. And the theory is that a lot of energy is wasted in trying to keep close relationships secret.\nBut there are other factors that impact job performance. The first is pretty obvious: how good is the relationship? A healthy relationship <strong>boosts morale&lt;\/strong&gt;, energy and enthusiasm. Work motivation can improve because workplace lovers\u2019 enthusiasm for being at work increases. So, if you put pressure on a relationship, you will cause stress for individuals and reduce motivation.\nBut workplace relationships can cause resentment among other employees who feel, rightly or wrongly, that <strong><span>favouritism&lt;\/span&gt;&lt;\/strong&gt; occurs. This could decrease the productivity and morale of those not in a workplace relationship. And the more counter-cultural romantic relationships are to an organization, the greater the problem. Workplace relationships happen, full stop. Draconian rules often lead to secrecy, <strong>rumours&lt;\/strong&gt;, <span><strong>gossip&lt;\/strong&gt;&lt;\/span&gt; and false accusations. Being open, grown-up and sensible is the best strategy.&lt;\/p&gt;\n"},"library":"H5P.AdvancedText 1.1","subContentId":"734a3a0e-7618-49d1-b49e-ca22ce54ec23","metadata":{"contentType":"Text","license":"U","title":"Unbenannt: Text","authors":[],"changes":[]}},"useSeparator":"auto"}]},</strong></span></strong></span></strong></strong></strong></span></strong></strong></span></strong></span></strong></strong></strong></span></strong></strong></p></span></h3>