Lernsprache
Brand
Quelle
Sprachlevel
Übungstyp
Ausgabennummer
202001
Ausgabe EVT
Position
26
Original-Rubrik
Lesen und verstehen
Original-Unter-Rubrik
How to learn management
ContentHub Node reference (NID)
61958
Übungscontent
Übungscontent(JSON)
{"content":[{"content":{"params":{"introPage":{"showIntroPage":false,"startButtonText":"Start","introduction":""},"progressType":"dots","passPercentage":50,"texts":{"prevButton":"Zur\u00fcck","nextButton":"Weiter","finishButton":"Beenden","textualProgress":"Aktuelle Frage: @current von @total Fragen","jumpToQuestion":"Frage %d von %total","questionLabel":"Frage","readSpeakerProgress":"Frage @current von @total","unansweredText":"Unbeantwortet","answeredText":"Beantwortet","currentQuestionText":"Aktuelle Frage"},"disableBackwardsNavigation":false,"randomQuestions":false,"endGame":{"showResultPage":true,"showSolutionButton":true,"noResultMessage":"Beendet","message":"Ihr Ergebnis:","overallFeedback":[{"from":0,"to":100}],"solutionButtonText":"L\u00f6sung anzeigen","retryButtonText":"Wiederholen","finishButtonText":"Beenden","showAnimations":false,"skippable":false,"skipButtonText":"Video \u00fcberspringen"},"override":{"checkButton":true},"questions":[{"library":"H5P.MultiChoice 1.12","params":{"question":"<p>Choose the best summary of the article.<\/p>\n","answers":[{"text":"The army is the best model of professionalism.","correct":false,"tipsAndFeedback":{"tip":"","chosenFeedback":"","notChosenFeedback":""}},{"text":"The best way to learn is in a master class.","correct":false,"tipsAndFeedback":{"tip":"","chosenFeedback":"","notChosenFeedback":""}},{"text":"Neither \u201camateurism\u201d nor \u201ccredentialism\u201d is the best way to learn management.","correct":true,"tipsAndFeedback":{"tip":"","chosenFeedback":"","notChosenFeedback":""}},{"text":"Apprenticeships are a good way to learn.","correct":false,"tipsAndFeedback":{"tip":"","chosenFeedback":"","notChosenFeedback":""}}],"behaviour":{"enableRetry":true,"enableSolutionsButton":true,"enableCheckButton":true,"type":"auto","singlePoint":false,"randomAnswers":false,"showSolutionsRequiresInput":false,"disableImageZooming":false,"confirmCheckDialog":false,"confirmRetryDialog":false,"autoCheck":false,"passPercentage":100,"showScorePoints":true},"overallFeedback":[{"from":0,"to":100}],"UI":{"checkAnswerButton":"\u00dcberpr\u00fcfen","showSolutionButton":"L\u00f6sung anzeigen","tryAgainButton":"Wiederholen","tipsLabel":"Hinweis zeigen","scoreBarLabel":"Punkte","tipAvailable":"Hinweis verf\u00fcgbar","feedbackAvailable":"R\u00fcckmeldung verf\u00fcgbar","readFeedback":"R\u00fcckmeldung lesen","wrongAnswer":"Falsche Antwort","correctAnswer":"Richtige Antwort","shouldCheck":"H\u00e4tte gew\u00e4hlt werden m\u00fcssen","shouldNotCheck":"H\u00e4tte nicht gew\u00e4hlt werden sollen","noInput":"Bitte antworte, bevor du die L\u00f6sung ansiehst"},"confirmCheck":{"header":"Beenden?","body":"Bist Du sicher, dass Du beenden m\u00f6chtest?","cancelLabel":"Abbrechen","confirmLabel":"Beenden"},"confirmRetry":{"header":"Wiederholen?","body":"Bist Du sicher, dass Du die Aufgabe wiederholen m\u00f6chtest?","cancelLabel":"Abbrechen","confirmLabel":"Best\u00e4tigen"},"media":{"params":{}}},"subContentId":"4f020fb9-c148-400c-b67b-c42d5e86513f","metadata":{"contentType":"Multiple Choice","title":"Summary","license":"U","extraTitle":"Summary","authors":[],"changes":[]}}]},"library":"H5P.QuestionSet 1.15","subContentId":"26eb379d-da5c-4b7e-af12-a7f1a434c361","metadata":{"contentType":"Question Set","title":"Summary","license":"U","extraTitle":"Summary","authors":[],"changes":[]}},"useSeparator":"auto"},{"content":{"params":{"text":"</p><h3><span>Article<\/span><\/h3>\n\n<p><span>Particularly in the UK, there are two opposite and equally misleading theories about how to learn management. One is that all you need is common sense and experience (\u201camateurism\u201d). The other is that you need the credentials (\u201ccredentialism\u201d) to do your job effectively. Neither theory works well, however.<\/span><\/p>\n\n</span></p><p><span>Firms that don\u2019t believe in management training are often poorly managed, don\u2019t have people management systems and are <strong>prone to<\/strong> the idiosyncrasies of individual managers who believe their own methods are best.<\/span><\/p>\n\n</strong></span></p><p><span>A credentialist company, on the other hand, is training-obsessed. It may produce catalogues of approved in-house courses or specialist external courses on everything from negotiation skills to letter writing. The assumption is that no aspect of management, however <strong>mundane<\/strong> or trivial, can be acquired through observation or self-learning.<\/span><\/p>\n\n</strong></span></p><p><span>But neither the amateur nor the credentialist is a professional. The <strong>hallmark<\/strong> of professionalism is, really, conscientious workmanship. It means that people conform to the technical and ethical standard of a vocation. The army offers a good model of professional management training. Officers go through a series of courses and exercises to learn simple but important skills. There are clear systems developed to encourage good management \u2014 including <strong>appraisal<\/strong> systems, skills and practices. Because systems are followed, there is consistency in people management over time and across different branches. The army is also less prone to following the wild mood swings of gurus as they find new magic bullets in old ideas dressed up for the modern zeitgeist.<\/span><\/p>\n\n</strong></strong></span></p><p><span>People have not fundamentally changed much over the past 500 years, and if a management style and socialization process has been found that is efficient, there seems little reason to change it.<\/span><\/p>\n\n</span></p><p><span>Indeed, the way in which people join professions through a lengthy and fairly <strong>arduous<\/strong> apprenticeship is a good model for how to acquire management skills. An apprentice studies with, observes and learns from a master. This rather old-fashioned approach to learning seems to have been revived of late, with the very popular \u201cmaster-class concept\u201d, whereby people literally sit at the feet of a master and learn from him or her. It suggests a great hunger for a forgotten educational method.<\/span><\/p>\n\n</strong></span></p><p><span>One goes to professionals because they are well trained to deliver exacting standards. But neither amateurs nor credentialists can deliver <strong>exacting<\/strong> management standards. Too much or too little of a good thing leads to equally unhappy consequences.<\/span><\/p>\n"},"library":"H5P.AdvancedText 1.1","subContentId":"734a3a0e-7618-49d1-b49e-ca22ce54ec23","metadata":{"contentType":"Text","title":"Summary","license":"U","authors":[],"changes":[]}},"useSeparator":"auto"}]},</strong></span></p></span></h3>
Updated
No
Stand alone
Off
Reading time
94
Display context
Off