When discussions in the boardroom turn to the question of whom to promote, four considerations usually come into play:
• One. Can they do it? (1) _________ What support or development do they need?
• Two. Do they have or will they be able to create the network they’ll need to succeed in the new role?
• Three. What is the flight risk if we go for another solution? Do we even have another solution?
• Four. What will happen with the role they leave? (2) _________
If you are on the list of candidates for potential promotion, you should think carefully about each of these considerations. The importance of the first and the second considerations about performance, potential and people (3) _________ And we will find space in a future column to talk about the third consideration — your leverage.
For now, let’s think about the fourth consideration: who should do your job when you move on? Surprisingly often, (4) _________
Or maybe not so surprisingly. Usually, we do not pay much attention to the question of who can do our job other than ourselves. First of all, we already have a job to do. Why worry about who else can do it? This is a perfectly valid approach as long as you are bent on staying in the job. It becomes a problem, however, if and when you do want to move on. Secondly, helping others become able to do what you do means investing time in a venture whose outcome is highly uncertain. It is not clear whether they will learn what you have to teach. And if they do, who is to say they will not take these skills and move themselves ahead of you?
If you carry any such thoughts around with you, I strongly recommend some critical self-examination. Instead of holding on to people by keeping them small, why not become a talent factory and watch how quickly good people will start wanting to work with you?
They won’t stay forever, and you won’t want them to. Apart from dramatically increasing team results, the flow of talents will give you a shifting but always clear answer to the fourth consideration. And this will no longer be a reason not to promote you.
Lernsprache
Brand
Quelle
Sprachlevel
Übungstyp
Ausgabennummer
202108
Ausgabe EVT
Position
15
Original-Rubrik
Reading
Original-Unter-Rubrik
Preparing to move on
ContentHub Node reference (NID)
79198
Übungscontent
Übungscontent(JSON)
{"content":[{"content":{"params":{"overallFeedback":[{"from":0,"to":100}],"checkAnswerButton":"\u00dcberpr\u00fcfen","tryAgainButton":"Wiederholen","showSolutionButton":"L\u00f6sung anzeigen","behaviour":{"enableRetry":true,"enableSolutionsButton":true,"enableCheckButton":true,"showScorePoints":true},"correctAnswer":"Richtig!","incorrectAnswer":"Falsch!","missedAnswer":"Nicht gefunden!","displaySolutionDescription":"Die L\u00f6sungen sind nun im Text markiert.","scoreBarLabel":"Du hast :num von :total Punkten erreicht.","a11yFullTextLabel":"Gesamter lesbarer Text","a11yClickableTextLabel":"Gesamter Text, wo W\u00f6rter markiert werden k\u00f6nnen","a11ySolutionModeHeader":"L\u00f6sungsmodus","a11yCheckingHeader":"Antworten \u00fcberpr\u00fcfen-Modus","taskDescription":"<p>Six words are marked in red in the article. Choose the correct options to complete these sentences.<\/p>\n","textField":"</p><p>A. Organizations that have adopted an innovative <strong>*approach* \/ outcome<\/strong> to the workplace are seeing improvements in performance.\nB. He admitted that it was an ambitious, expensive and risky <strong>leverage \/ *venture*<\/strong> that he hoped would pay off in the long term.\nC. He wrote that he would welcome the opportunity to assume a leadership <strong>promotion \/ *role*<\/strong> within the organization.<\/p>\n"},"library":"H5P.MarkTheWords 1.9","metadata":{"contentType":"Mark the Words","license":"U","title":"Key words","extraTitle":"Key words","authors":[],"changes":[]},"subContentId":"744ac39d-bb94-4d87-a214-5681dabb3fae"},"useSeparator":"auto"}]},</strong></strong></strong></p>
Updated
Yes
Digitization status
Stand alone
Off
Reading time
23
Display context
Off